[參考文獻(xiàn)]

[1] [15] [17] [18][21] [23][25] [28] 鈕先鐘.戰(zhàn)略家[M].桂林：廣西師范大學(xué)出版社，2003.19,22-27.

[2] [9] [美] 約翰·柯林斯.大戰(zhàn)略[M].北京：中國(guó)人民解放軍戰(zhàn)士出版社，1978.8，13，46-47.

[3] M.A.米爾施泰因等.論資產(chǎn)階級(jí)軍事科學(xué)[M].黃良羽等譯，北京：軍事科學(xué)出版社，1985.30.

[4] 鈕先鐘.戰(zhàn)略研究[M].桂林：廣西師范大學(xué)出版社，2003.3.

[5] [19]軍事科學(xué)院計(jì)劃組織部.戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)與戰(zhàn)略問題研究[M].北京：軍事科學(xué)出版社，1988.174，144,156.

[6] [10] [瑞士]A·H· 若米尼著.戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)藝術(shù)概論[M].劉聰，袁堅(jiān)譯.北京：解放軍出版社，1986.29，87.

[7] [德] 克勞塞維茨.戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)論(第1卷)[M].北京：商務(wù)印書館，1978.175.

[8] [24] 美國(guó)陸軍軍事學(xué)院.軍事戰(zhàn)略[M].軍事科學(xué)院外國(guó)軍事研究部譯.北京：軍事科學(xué)出版社，1986.3，4.

[11] [12] [13] [14][22] [29]吳春秋.論大戰(zhàn)略和世界戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)史[M].北京：解放軍出版社,2002.10,30-33.

[16] [26] [27] 吳春秋.淺談“大戰(zhàn)略”和“國(guó)家戰(zhàn)略”[J].世界知識(shí)，1984(12).

[20]習(xí)近平在出席解放軍代表團(tuán)全體會(huì)議時(shí)強(qiáng)調(diào)深入實(shí)施軍民融合發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略努力開創(chuàng)強(qiáng)軍興軍新局面[N].人民日?qǐng)?bào)，2015-03-13.

[30] 臺(tái)灣《中華戰(zhàn)略學(xué)刊》(1985年春季號(hào)),轉(zhuǎn)引自吳春秋.論大戰(zhàn)略和世界戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)史[M].北京：解放軍出版社,2002.11.

[31] [日]伊藤憲一.國(guó)家與戰(zhàn)略[M].北京：軍事科學(xué)出版社，1989.1.

[32] [英] 利德爾·哈特.論戰(zhàn)略和大戰(zhàn)略.轉(zhuǎn)引自時(shí)殷弘.戰(zhàn)略二十講[M].天津：天津人民出版社，2008.5.

On Scientific Connotation of National Strategy

Bo GuiLi

[Abstract] As a kind of exotic, the conception of national strategy was introduced to Mainland China at the beginning of 1980s. It was once unpopular and only few scholars used it in their researches. However, it often appeared in recent years on academic books, media reports and leaders’ speeches, which shows that such conception has been accepted and become a very important strategic concept in China. To accurately understand and correctly use this conception, to improve the researches on this issue and to realize the scientification of decision-making on national strategy, this paper reviews the conceptional evolution of national strategy, analyzes the characteristics of American definition and its main problems, explains the scientific connotation and key features of new definition from the views of combinations of history and reality as well as theory and practice, and then suggests using the conception of national strategy in relative studies and terminologies so as to benefit for further communications and exchanges and for better playing the thinktank role in top-level strategic researches.

[Keywords]national strategy, grand strategy, strategy research

[Author]Bo Guili is Director and Professor at Center for National Strategic Studies, Chinese Academy of Governance. Beijing 100089